PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI MENGGUNAKAN ANALOGI PADA KONSEP RANGKAIAN LISTRIK SERI DAN PARALEL

Nyoto Suseno & Agus Setiawan (2012) Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Menggunakan Analogi Pada Konsep Rangkaian Listrik Seri Dan Paralel, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, Vol.19 No.2 2012 LP3 UM Malang

TEXT fulteks.pdf Download

ABSTRAK

A study using research and development (R & D) was carried out to design inquiry based learning using analogy on concept of the electric series and parallel circuit. Preliminary data is done in same physics education programs in the island Java and Sumatra. It was collected through documentation study, observation and interview. Based on the data, it had been developed learning model in order to carry out  limited experiment on physics education program. The steps of data analysis were:  selecting and classifying data, coding and describing of the conclusions to decide on the theme consistent to the focus of the research. Research findings show that: 1) the inquiry process could be conducted completely in classroom by group discussion supported analogy as trigger and demonstration to representing electric series and parallel circuit, accompanied with a worksheet, 2) electric series and parallel circuit as target domain could be analogy with composition series-parallel in elastic spring as base domain, and 3) inquiry learning process need  are longer time, because the students were not been ready and had low capability in learning physics.   

Keywords: inquiry, analogy, electric series and parallel circuit, composition series-parallel in elastic spring, electricity and magnetism.

REFERENSI

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><xml> </xml> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} </style>

Aulls, M. W. & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in Education. The Conceptual Foundations for Research as a Curricular Imperative. Volume 1. New York: Lawrences Erlbaum Associates.

Buck, G. A., Latta, M. A. M. & Pelecky, D. L. L. (2007). “Learning How to Make Inquiry into Electricity and Magnetism Discernible to Middle Level Teachers”. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 18, 377 - 397.

Case, N. K. (1998). “The Role of Collaborative Inquiry and reflective Practice in Teacher Preparation”. The Professional Educator. 21, (1), 1–14.

Chiu, M. H. dan Lin, L. W. (2005). “Promoting Fourth Graders' Conceptual Change of Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple Analogies”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42, (4), 429 - 464.

Demirci, N. dan Cirkinoglu, A. (2004). “Ditermining Students' Preconception/Misconceptions in Electricity and Magnetism”. Journal of Turkish science education. 1, (2), 50- 54.

Engelhardt, P. V. dan Beichner, R. J. (2004). “Students' Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits”. American Journal Physics. 72, (1), 98 - 115.

Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J. & Heuvelen A. V. (2001). “Surveying Student's Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and Magnetism”. American Journal Physics. 69, (7), 12 - 23.

Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2006). “Teaching electromagnetics at the undergraduate level: a comprehensive approach”. European Journal of Physics. 27, 727-742.

Narjaikaew, P. (2005). Year-1 Thai University Students’ Conceptions of Electricity and Megnetism. Physics Educational Network of Thailand (PENThai) and The Centre for science and Technology Education Research (CSTER).

NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standars. Washington: National Academy Press.

NSTA. (1998). Standards for Science Teacher preparation. NSTA in collaboration with the Association for the Education of Theachers in Science.

Oliva, J. M. (2005). “What Professional Knowledge Should we as Physics Teachers have about The Use of Analogies?”. Journal Physics Teacher Education.  3, (1), 11 – 16.

Podolefsky, N. S. and Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). “Use of Analogy in Learning Physics: The Role of Representation”. Physics Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research. 2, (020101), 1 – 10.

Planinic, M. (2006). “Assessment of Difficulties of Same Conceptual areas from Electricity and Magnetism Using The Conceptual Survey of Electricity and magnetism”. American Journal of  Physics. 74, (12), 1143 – 1148.

Singh, C. (2006). “Student Understending of Symmetry and Gauss’s Law of Electricity’. American Journal Physics. 74, (10), 923 – 936.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2009). “The Importance of Mapping and Utilizing Analogies in Learning of Abstract Concepts on Electricity and Magnetism. Proceeding of The Third International Seminar on Science Education, Bandung October 17^th 2009. Bandung: Indonesia University of Bandung. 563 – 572.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Penggunaan Analogi dan Klasifikasinya dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Abstrak Listrik-Magnet di LPTK. Disampaikan pada seminar nasional pendidikan IPA di P4TK IPA Bandung pada tanggal 10 April 2010.

Suseno, N., Setiawan, A. & Rustaman, N. Y. (2010). Model Pembelajaran menggunakan analogi dalam perkuliahan listrik-magnet. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Sains, di Solo pada tanggal 8 Mei 2010. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret. 125 – 129.