IMPROVED COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE FOR PHYSICS STUDENTS TEACHER

Sarwanto (2016) Improved Communication Competence For Physics Students Teacher

Lembaga Penelitian Um Metro


File Pdf Download


ABSTRACT

Communication competence is important to the teachers to transform their knowledge and skills. One disadvantage of the physics education student is verbal communication skills. This study aims to improve communication skills of the students using a visual - verbal representations based learning. This research method is a quasi - experimental, the sampl e were students of physical education department. Quantitative data were analyzed by time series. The results showed a significant increase communication skills after participating in learning with visual - verbal representations. Oral communication skills d evelop faster than written communication. Further efforts are needed to improve written communication skills for students of physics education, given at the end of the course the student must make a scientific paper.

Keywords: Oral Communication, Written Communication, Visual - Verbal Representations, Learning Physics

REFERENSI

[1] Andersen, P. A (1989). A Cognitive Valence Theory of Intimate Communication. Paper presented at theIowa Network on Personal Relationships Confer - ence, Iowa City, May. [2] Bandura, A. (1982). Self - efficacy mechanism in humanagency American Psychologist, 37, 122 - 147. [3] Canary, D. J., and Spitzberg, B. H. (1989). A model ofthe perceived competence of conflict strategies. Hu - man Communication Research, 15, 630 - 649. [4] Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., andLongo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good,but ... : A meta - analytic review of research on the [5] physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bul - letin, 110, 109 - 128. [6] Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in ro - mantic partners and same - sex friends A meta - analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226 - 235. [7] Greene, J. 0. (1984). A cognitive approach to humancommunicat ion. An action assembly theory. Com - munication Monographs, 51, 289 - 300. [8] Havighurst, R. J. (1957). The social competence ofmiddle - aged people. Genetic Psychology Mono - graphs, 56, 297 - 375. [9] Hocked J. W. (1985). A structural theory of personalconsistenc y. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 118 - 129. [10] Kaplowitz, S. A. (1978). Towards a systematic theoryof power attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 131 - 148. [11] I mahori, T. T., and Lanigan, M. L. (1989). Relationalmodel of intercultural communication compe tence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13,269 - 286. [12] McAdams, a V (1988) "Personal Needs and PersonalRelationships." In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Per - sonal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interven - dons, 7 - 22. New York: Wiley. [13 ] Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., and Miron, S. (1975). Cross - Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning Ur - bana. University of Illinois Press. [14] Pavia, C., and Haight, L. (1985). The 'competentcommunicator" as a cognitive prototype. HumanCommunication Research, 12, 225 - 241. [15] Spitzberg, B. H. (1989). Issues in the development ofa theory of interpersonal competence in the inter - cultural context. International Journal of Intercul - tural Relations, 13, 241 - 268. [16] Spitzberg, B. H. (1993). The dialectics of (i n) compe - tence. Journal of Sinful and Personal Relationships,10, 137 - 158. [17] Spitzberg, B. II., and Cupach, W R (1984) Interper - sonal Communication Competence. Beverly Hills,Calif.: Sage. [18] Spitzberg, B. H., and Cupach, W. R. (1984). Handbookof Inter personal Competence Research. New YorkSpringer - Verlag. [19] Spitzberg, B. H., and Hecht, M. L. (1989). A compo - nent model of relational competence. Human Com - munication Research, 10, 575 - 599.