IMPLEMENTATION OF PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING: IN A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY AT FINANCE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT NTB PROVINCE

Dody Irawan, Ahmad Rifai, BasukiPrayitno (2016) Implementation Of Performance Based Budgeting: In A Phenomenological Study At Finance And Asset Management Ntb Province

Lembaga Penelitian Um Metro


File Pdf Download


ABSTRACT

This qualitative research is focus on the implementation of performance - based budgeting in a unit of local bureaucracy, BPKAD, NTB. The parts that where s tudies where the stages of budgeting (PBK) itself such as planning, implementation, measurement, evaluation, and reporting. From this research unit, PBK also show obstacles, constraints and problems faced by employee (agent or participant) in the face of t his new budgeting models. Between understandings , social agent/participants as well as exsiting systems are inseparable and intertwined. The data collection in various stages, through written materials that are considered relevant, then field reserach, obs ervation, interviews and documentation. This research is phenomenology which with has continuity to the theoritical framework by Anthony Giddens structuation to sharpen the research direction and obtain a framework to measure and write data, especially in the view of the central role of the “action” in a period of time and in a given space. In addition, its showing that is too centrality of “knoweledgeability” in social action. Result of this research show that obstancles to the implementation of performanc e based budgeting is based on measures of internal PBK itself caused by the level of understanding of the participants in this study. The level of understanding of PBK is detemined by the voluntary actions of the participants and their bureaucracy formal a ction.

Keywords: Performance based Budgeting, Structuration, Practice and Phenomenology

REFERENSI

[1] Mardiasmo, 2002, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Yogyakarta: Andi. [2] Sri Rahayu, 2007, “ Studi Fenomenologis terhadap Proses Penyusunan Anggaran Daerah (Bukti Empiris dari Satu Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah di Propinsi Jambi)”, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. [3] Anthony Giddens. 1979. Cultural Problems in Sosial Theory. London Macmillan . [4] Haoran Lu, 1998, Performance Budgeting Resuscitated:“Why is it still inviable?”, Journal of public Budgeting, accounting & Financial Manage ment, Summer 1998;10,2. [5] Wang, Xiaohu, 1999, “ Conditions to implement outcome - oriented performance budgeting : some empirical evidence”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Winter 1999;11,4. [6] Robinson, Marc, 2002, “ Best Pra ctices in Performance Budgeting ”, Discussion Paper, No. 124 November 2002, Queensland University of Technology. [7] Lynn H.Turner, 2008, Pengantar Teori Komunikasi: Analisis dan Aplikasi Jakarta: Salemba Humanika. [8] Indra Bastian, 2006, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Jakarta: Erlangga [9] Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, 1973, Implementation , Barkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. [10] M. Aris Firmansyah, 2007, Faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi perencanaan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja di Prov. DKI Jak arta, Universitas Indonesia.