THE USE OF FREIES ERMESSEN (DISCRETION) IN THE ACTIVITY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Aldri Frinaldi (2016) The Use Of Freies Ermessen (discretion) In The Activity Of Central Government And Local Government

Lembaga Penelitian Um Metro


File Pdf Download


ABSTRACT

Nowadays Indonesia has a tendency to apply the legal system administratively, which dominate in every activities include public administration must be on rules written. There are conditions in making of legislations that run s low, or their conditions had not been anticipated in certain condition. Besides, there is the dynamic development of social life runs rapid ly that requires immediate treatment by government or local government. In this circumstance, it requires the auton omy of the government to act in dealing with issues that happened. The use of freies ermessen can be shown to emerge certain innovation from the bureaucracy reformation for public interest. The form of this freies ermessen can be shown in some forms such a s circular letter, guidance, and announcement, abstract and general letter of decision as well as in a form f regulation which is called pseudo - wet giving.

Keyword : Discretion, Government, Local Government, Regulation Administration

REFERENSI

[1] S.F.Marbun.1997. Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta; Liberty. [2] Winahyu, Erwiningsi h. 2006. Peranan Hukum Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perbuatan Pemerintahan (Bestuurshandeling) (Suatu kajian dalam Kebijakan Pembangunan Hukum). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9 (2). [3] S. Prajudi Atmosudirjo. 1994.Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Ghalia Indo nesia, Jakarta. [4] Ridwan HR. 2011. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers. [5] Laica Marzuki. 1996. Peraturan Kebijaksanaan (Beleidsregel) Hakikat serta Julista Mustamu, Diskresidan Tanggungjawab serta Fungsinya Selaku Saran a Hukum Pemerintahan, Makalah pada Penataran Nasional Hukum Acara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanudin, Ujung Pandang 26 - 31 Agustus 1996. [6] Aristoni. 2014. Tindakan Hukum Diskresi dalam Konsep Welfare State Perspektif Hu kum Administrasi Negara dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Penelitian, 8 (2), 221 - 246. Unpublished [7] Fathudin. 2015. Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dugaan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang) Pejabat Publik (Perspektif Undang - Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintah an). Jurnal Cita Hukum. Vol. II No. 1 Juni 2015; 115 - 132. journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/article/download/1844/1741. unpublished [8] Muchamad Arif Agung Nugroho.2012. Perintah Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Telepon dan Akibat Hukumnya.Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum QISTI. Vol. 6 No. 1 Januari 2012. unpublished [9] Julista Mustamu. 2011. Diskresi Dan Tanggungjawab Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Sasi Vol. 17 No. 2 Bulan April - Juni 2011; 1 - 9. Unpublished