Safrin Salam (2016) Reinforcement The Role Of Bani (indonesian National Board Of Arbitration) By Justice Decision To Face Trade Dispute On Asean Economic Community
The purpose of this study were 1) to know and understand the legal considerations of the application of the reasons for cancellation of the award of article 70 of Law No. 30 in a 1999 Supreme Court decision No. 199 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 ensure legal certainty in relation to the disputing parties, and 2) to determine the strength of the legal enforcea bility of arbitral awards article 60 of Law No. 30 in a 1999 after the Supreme Court Decision No. 199 K/Pdt.Sus/2012. This research is a normative law. The Method used is juridical - normative by interpretation method for analyzing secondary data.. The res ults showed that the application of the Law Consideration Reasons for Cancellation of Arbitration Award Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Decision No. MA. 199 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 is a legal consideration of al l the cancellation decision is not accepted or rejected application for cancellation of the award under the legal grounds contained in Article 70 of Law No. 30, 1999. As well as the Power of Legal Enforceability of Arbitration Decision Article 70 and Artic le 60 of Law no. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution after the Supreme Court decision No. 199 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 is the Supreme Court decision No. 199 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 strengthen the principle of final and binding arbitration attached to the decision issued by the Institute of Arbitration. (Ad - Hoc Arbitration Tribunal, BANI, etc.)
Keywords : BANI, Justice Decision, Trade Dispute, ASEAN Economic Community.